Who wants hotrodpete back? yes or no please

Page 1 / 5
iman007, Jun 15, 6:17pm
hi admin, let me know if im taking a liberty, but i saw some comment between a couple of posters here.
Firstly, im a newbie here, but what i saw going on was definitely not 1 sided.Im taking it pete and john are both adults and CAN act like adults on this mb.Other mbs im on people only geta warning first up then a ban.Could you reconsider the decision and thoughts of posters here and even let everyone know what is likely to happen if it gets personal.I thought pete was a valuable member who contributed well to discussions.Im sure john is prolly alrite too, once you meet him!
if this gets through!

yes, bring him back

henderson_guy, Jun 15, 6:18pm
Bring him BACK!

attitudedesignz, Jun 15, 6:20pm
Yep, bring him back.

ginga4lyfe, Jun 15, 6:22pm
Bring him back

lookoutas, Jun 15, 6:24pm
Bring back Pete

Who's Buck!

stevo2, Jun 15, 6:30pm
We await his return.

snoopy221, Jun 15, 6:30pm
Not only BRING HIM BACK.BUT
Trade me should you involve the trade me team herin-please recall the *bring back zephyrheaven* scenario.
The experienced mechanics in motoring take some things as a
par for the course.
However in the last 2 months we seem to have a *cyber bully*herin
MANY warnings have been given-MANY experienced posters of many YEARS standing have left.
SHOULD! ALL these *warnings/complaints be from one! user then perhaps it's time users had the NUMBER of complaints against other posters NOTED against their memership.
Perhaps a SIMPLE checking of IF! this recent unusually LARGE amount of complaints against posters herin.
Is simply some idiotic wanna be (know it all*-who-wants to be the only one able to post their uniformed and unknowledgeable postings-well!
Is that really fair!
There are enough long standing posters here who-well myself-i have NEVER complained.
a concerted agreement between 5 or so of a few years standing each-all voted for by the *motoring* forum itselfwould IMHO see an INSTANT-PULL YA HEAD IN
Warning given to ONE specific poster here.
[and should your complaints over the last 2 months be SOLELY from that poster therin perhaps there needs to be a limiting process to
Prevent *cyber bullying*-which is sadly the scenario is see currently here.
Thanks.

h.e, Jun 15, 6:32pm
no.he started it.he carried on with the abuse,he must have known the result.leave him where he is

iman007, Jun 15, 6:34pm
i was there too, there was needling!

snoopy221, Jun 15, 6:34pm
memeber since 2005.
good to see someone who has been here a while-i appreciate your point.

dansue, Jun 15, 6:36pm
Bring him back !

h.e, Jun 15, 6:40pm
"how the hell"post 8 2nding advice given.post 9 abuse,post 10 same advice from someone else,post 11 petes thanking post 10!
pete hates john's guts,abused him every chance he got

iman007, Jun 15, 6:43pm
a simple yes or no will suffice!

thunderbolt, Jun 15, 6:47pm
Yes, can we swap him for a nominated member!

johnf_456, Jun 15, 6:52pm
Yup he did, has I remember someone else said 2 weeks but he was gobsmacked by that so I said 2 weeks to reassure him and then came the abuse.(when it was right). But I don't think its just that thread has I do see him post in general also and in general its real easy to rark them up. But really he will not be back, once you are gone that is it. He would of had warning also.

xacoon, Jun 15, 6:59pm
BRING BACK PETE! BAN THE HUMAN WRECKINGBALL(BAG)!

johnf_456, Jun 15, 7:02pm
Might be very well but trademe is a very large site with tens of thousands who would view the boards, so for it to be one person it is high unlikely. But really it does not matter how trademe find out, if its breaches there rules then we all know how it goes. And fyi its not me, hence keeping it on the boards

xacoon, Jun 15, 7:03pm
yep, despises him, as a fair few who have left this message board in the last couple of months will agree with. but with that in mind, if you were in johns shoes would you have posted without expecting exactly what followed! I would have liked to think if I was I would have just not posted, saving the following bullcrap, maybe its an attention seeking thing! I dont know.

attitudedesignz, Jun 15, 7:08pm
BRING BACK PETE! BAN THE HUMAN WRECKINGBALL(BAG)!BRING BACK PETE! BAN THE HUMAN WRECKINGBALL(BAG)!BRING BACK PETE! BAN THE HUMAN WRECKINGBALL(BAG)!BRING BACK PETE! BAN THE HUMAN WRECKINGBALL(BAG)!BRING BACK PETE! BAN THE HUMAN WRECKINGBALL(BAG)!BRING BACK PETE! BAN THE HUMAN WRECKINGBALL(BAG)!BRING BACK PETE! BAN THE HUMAN WRECKINGBALL(BAG)!

smac, Jun 15, 7:09pm
lol man you guys need a serious reality check, or a little perspective.or something. Get a grip, you look like a bunch of school kids.

johnf_456, Jun 15, 7:10pm
Reckon, was school dismissed!

snoopy221, Jun 15, 7:11pm
But really it does not matter how trademe find out, if its breaches there rules then we all know how it goes

Essentialy it DOES matter.
I.E. in motoring there are MANY times a (link) is posted.
When a warning is recieved many weeks AFTER said same (link) is posted.
When the thread relates to a particular engine and marinisation of same engine-and the specific engine is commercialy in use as one of this countries scenic attractions and marinised [In House essentialy] and ya the only damn houer that KNOWS THAT.
well.IMHO another poster in that self same thread waited and complained-clearly they could not offer ANY advice on the marinisation of that specific engine-as could no-one else in the thread.
So ya see
But really it does not matter how trademe find out, if its breaches there rules then we all know how it goes
I substantiate my point and regurgitate your *opinion*

lookoutas, Jun 15, 7:11pm
johnf - I've just read it all and you should have just shut-up. You actually caused this through aggravation. Now do the decent thing and the stay the hell out of this.

xacoon, Jun 15, 7:12pm
kinda catchy after a while isn't it

snoopy221, Jun 15, 7:13pm
Incidentaly twas not only hrp in the thread that is referred to herin re the banning-but also another long term poster skin1235 who i have NEVER seen get that damn wound up-and -well that states a LOT-IMHO