$16,999! Wow , people are getting bang for buck.

pebbles61, May 19, 10:27am
lol NZ and it's bloody Toyota tax.
smac, May 19, 10:35am
What ARE you on about.they say it was advertised for $16999 22 years ago.seems about right.
pebbles61, May 19, 10:41am
As smac says, that was 22 years ago. Still don't see why it should be $5k now though lol
kazbanz, May 19, 10:42am
but it has onluy done 6100km according to the advert
aragorn2003, May 19, 10:44am
what i'm saying is comparing a $16,000 car today to this car back then. getting some bang for buck now.

Obviously I wasn't driving back in 1991 lol

Yeah 5k is abit steep
aragorn2003, May 19, 10:44am
second owner since 8000 LOL!
bellky, May 19, 10:46am
Stink car. Sorry.
pebbles61, May 19, 10:46am
I think he means 61,000km as opposed to 6100km

http://www.carjam.co.nz/car/!plate=OU1195+
bellky, May 19, 11:31am
What I mean is fwd boring tin can with no guts and no features.
msigg, May 19, 11:46am
That car will last someone another 15 years easy if looked after, so could be cheap motoring if you wanted a basic car. Nothing wrong with that.
pebbles61, May 19, 12:08pm
Each to their own aye. I didn't like RWD and was so glad to get a FWD car again.

As for features, it has an electric washer pump!
waipawa, May 19, 1:56pm
Love the keyword spam at the bottom
petemun, May 19, 2:18pm
Why !
aragorn2003, May 19, 2:19pm
kept losing it around them corners
pebbles61, May 19, 2:24pm
Had a pretty nastey spin out and just didn't feel too safe in it to be honest. The car was fine (MGBGT) but I just prefered the landcrab more.
petemun, May 19, 3:46pm
fair enough
trogedon, May 19, 4:45pm
Word. Some of us don't want all the 'modern' Whizzbangery. Some people like the simple things in life - that's why my wife married me.
r15, May 19, 4:48pm
they all appear to be valid keywords at least.

i use keywords too when i can. helps your search hits for similar things!