For a honda Odyssey 4cyl 2350cc! I'm looking at some old reciepts but I didn't write down what vehicle that was for. I did get 12.46km/l out of it but my worst recording is 9.6.
tazcsv,
Jan 18, 1:36pm
Would not think so.
johnf_456,
Jan 18, 1:38pm
12.46km/l = 8.0L per 100km, 9.6km/l = 10.4L per 100
a18a,
Jan 18, 2:09pm
16km/l sounds way too good for an odyssey. also, l/100km is a dumb measurement imo
johnf_456,
Jan 18, 2:12pm
litres per hundred km is what a lot of cars are typically measured in from factory specifications.
wrong2,
Jan 18, 2:28pm
not what the OP is asking tho aye
johnf_456,
Jan 18, 2:31pm
Please try and post on the topic. Yes but to make it easy to compare it makes sense to have it in a measurement that is more widely comparable. Its like trying to compare fuel consumption while using knots.
wrong2,
Jan 18, 2:31pm
i could get 16 km/l out of the 1800cc bluebird i owned - but only just - total nana driving was required
the 2.0 liter model bluebird was a whole km/L worse than the 1800 ( 15 km/L at its best)
around 15 km/L (at best) is what i have seen from multiple 2.0L engined saloons so far
a18a,
Jan 18, 2:33pm
it's just a metric version of mpg. more simple than l/100km
wrong2,
Jan 18, 2:34pm
& instead of doing that, you gave the measurement that wasnt asked for
just try being shush
johnf_456,
Jan 18, 2:41pm
Not at all, converted it to a measurement so many can compare it to what many car manufacture release fuel economy information in.
Time to move on and stop having a dig.
MPG has no relevance anymore unless you live in the states
wrong2,
Jan 18, 2:44pm
try doing that john. or being shush
the latter would be preferable
johnf_456,
Jan 18, 2:48pm
I have by posting it in litres per hundred km to make it more easy to compare. For the engine size and body size of the car its very good. A lot of smaller engined cars depending on age are often around the 7 or 8 figure.
bit,
Jan 18, 3:09pm
Farout it's all good. I have it both ways now so it's a win. Let's just enjoy the internet shall we.
johnf_456,
Jan 18, 4:48pm
Its all good, some here just have a dig at me any chance they get bit. Very childish.
3tomany,
Jan 19, 6:55am
not a chance for odyssey
skin1235,
Jan 19, 8:00am
check those receipts again, they may relate to a time when prices were much higher than today, unless they actually give litres it would be easy to over calculate using todays prices
gedo1,
Jan 19, 1:31pm
You're right John_456. the litres per hundred km is the standard most widely used and accordingly it was helpful to have the conversion done for comparison reasons.Thank you for that as I got something from it too. It didn't mean that the OP was wrong., just chose to express the details in that way.Cheers
outbidyou2,
Jan 19, 4:01pm
tool
johnf_456,
Jan 19, 4:02pm
It appears the children are home.
mark.52,
Jan 19, 5:14pm
I agree. It's counterintuitive.
16km/L sounds like serious nanny driving on a flat, straight road. Like, steady 70km/hr without any braking or accelerating.
cowboy110,
Jan 19, 5:33pm
I actually found that quite helpful.The Holden on board computer works in litres per 100ks (as do a lot of other manufacturers) and hadn't even thought about converting it back the other way.
wrong2,
Jan 20, 12:28pm
most people prefer to know what they get out of every liter, rather than how many liters they use over 100 km's
johnf_456,
Jan 20, 12:32pm
I personally do as well but when you have to convert measurements around its easier just to use what manufactures specifications state! Than chomp and change, compare apples with apples, especially when dealing with lots of figures.
wrong2,
Jan 20, 1:42pm
which makes your "contributions" here odd
did you get what the OP is asking yet !
Since the public registrations are closed, you must have an invite from a current member to be able to register and post in this thread.
Have an account? Login here.