That didnt last long

Page 1 / 2
cagivachick1, Sep 25, 4:04pm
hmmmm

tony9, Sep 25, 4:25pm
And another one gone, while I was responding.

But I have a copy.

3tomany, Sep 25, 4:26pm
crazy stuff going on

bwg11, Sep 25, 4:27pm
Another one gone. Surely we deserve an explanation from the Moderator, as to which rules were breached.

ema1, Sep 25, 4:27pm
Someones nose is really out of joint and doesn't want it to be on TM, doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out folks.

tamarillo, Sep 25, 4:27pm
Ok I see what you mean. So we are not even allowed to discuss threads going it seems,
Which means this one will go too.

tony9, Sep 25, 4:29pm
Problem is that when you have a subject that says "A Major Vendor" cheating, before courts have convicted them, you are just asking for trouble.

ema1, Sep 25, 4:30pm
Why can it be discussed on radio & TV then as well as new papers then eh?

saxman99, Sep 25, 4:31pm
What if we typed something like: "Moderators engage in carnal relations with goats." Would that get a thread pulled?

butterfly05, Sep 25, 4:31pm
I notice even the audio doesnt work that you talked about? Wednesday the 23 at 10am? Anybody else?

tony9, Sep 25, 4:31pm
The rule would be "Do not post defamatory comments". Until a conviction is entered, such comment is potentially defamatory.

And it does not take a moderator to kill it, enough voting it off for no reason at all will kill it.

2sheddies, Sep 25, 4:32pm
I was just wondering that very thing. It's been reported, so of course there's bound to be discussion and opinion.

butterfly05, Sep 25, 4:33pm
PC gone mad is all it is.

tony9, Sep 25, 4:37pm
You are allowed to discuss it. Plenty of TM threads about it. But you are sailing a bit close to the wind when you make absolute statements about a nominated person or company when they have yet to be proved.

Company X is accused of cheating - fine
Company X is cheating - no good.

ema1, Sep 25, 4:37pm
I'm listening to it right now.
http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Audio.aspx scroll down to Thursday today , click the drop arrow and select 10:15am time slot and slide the bar across to about 4:20 on that audio feed and play it. It's on the Sean Plunket morning show.

mm12345, Sep 25, 4:40pm
Company X admitted cheating?

No Tony. Sniping at another member is more likely to be the issue here.

Plenty of other threads about VAG's atrocious admitted fraud aren't being deleted.

butterfly05, Sep 25, 4:41pm
Interesting everything else works except that one. LOL.

mm12345, Sep 25, 4:42pm
Defeat device enabled. I blame Bosch.

ema1, Sep 25, 4:45pm
I can pick it up no problem. again and at will.
The horizontal drag bar goes from 0 mins to 15 mins . drag it along to about 4 mins 20secs and listen from there. NZ flag choice is on then after that article is over the next is the one I'm talking about . starts about 4m 28sec and runs for about 5 mins.

ema1, Sep 25, 4:59pm
Select Thursday 24th (today) at top of the list .

2sheddies, Sep 25, 5:04pm
I have just listened to it on my phone, so it's definitely working butterfly. Must be an issue at your end. As ema says, Thursday 24th, 10:15 am. then move the thing along to about 4:20 in the 15 min segment.

countrypete, Sep 25, 5:17pm
The guy's a clown. Basically attempting to defend the absolutely indefensible. And when that won't wash, then deflect the argument. Goebbels would be proud.

ema1, Sep 25, 5:33pm
Sounds so familiar doesn't it, it isn't funny any more pete. Plenty of deflection and muddying of the waters plus a complete fogging of the issue going on there. and it's on record for all to hear too, no denying that irrespective of the attempts to deny on here.
It seems that the VAG CEO falling on his sword would suggest he's not denying it all . right.
Just listening to the news earlier there's now going to be a "witch hunt" in Germany now too, the next while is going to be very interesting and it has got my full attention . absolutely.
Reckon the allied powers might have been best to let VW die along with the 3rd Reich

tamarillo, Sep 25, 5:34pm
Yeah nah. The last one to go didn't even discuss that. Something weird.

seadubya, Sep 25, 5:38pm
It could be reporting due to this rule.
"Respect others

Don't abuse or harass people on the message board. Personal attacks are not acceptable. You may express a view on an issue or criticise a particular approach, but the message board is not a place to frame others in a negative light, or attack a person or their character. When discussing a topic, remember to focus on the issue and not the person. "
Unfortunately, not all rules are equal, but a report is my guess.