Buyer wants his cash back?

iwould take that text as a threat."how do u like ya burgers phil".
luckily he didnt mention mustard or tomato sauce coveredburgers. wats his trade me name.! or just a hint

The man isa nutter, addthat e mailit to yourpile for thehearing .Adjudicator with anybrain will see throughhis nonsense

This email suggests to me he might be suffering from some mental condition that requires medication. It is beyond belief.
Make sure you print this out and take it along with you - It's completely irrational and goes to show his state of mind.
As a dealer, I have dealt with thousands of buyers and NEVER come across this type of nonsense! It's hard to know if he is serious or he is treating it all as one big joke. Reading that last one, I'm dumbfounded!

Aside from any psychological issues, this guy could be a great writer if he turned his mind to it. He really does have a great command of the language.
edit; Maybe a journalist, he could turn a non-event into a lead item and be right up there with the rest of the Herald staff.

nah, tedious overblown tripe with a story line you could drive a knackered old banger through

Definitely take it to Fair Go. We all need to see this man in the flesh so we can point and laugh at him, while telling our kids to behave or they'll end up like the loony over there.

I wouldnt bother with 'Fair go' or the media at this stage.
Dont block his emails & definitely dont reply to any, just print them off & add them to your pile.

Do this.

Yes. not replying to his e-mails will only frustrate the looney, so no doubt more abuse will arrive. Just keep printing the e-mails off.

Agreed. This muppet will get pretty aggro about no response. Of course share them all with us lol.

Thanks for the update. Please keep us posted

Thank you to all. My wife and I are sitting here with our head spinning a little and this forum has been a general and genuine source of normality. Thank you thank you.

I have been to the police today as a result of the last email that I will post shortly after I finish my wine. And guess what.this character is known to the police. Mamma Mia!

But they can't stop him because at this point he has not made any threatening emails.merely harassing. I have two young girls, 7 and 9. I leave my family for days at a time and I am concerned this chap will snap, but the authorities are not able to even give him a warning. He can continue to email me with his vitriol.

I am so tempted to go public but the crowd I work for will likely fire me as I will expose their brand. I fear this man will start emailing them next.

Anyway I promise after we have had our wine I will go through the nearly 3 pages of the latest email to de identify the email and post it.

I apologies to Carter's for neglecting to take them out of one of the emails but they have done nothing but what a normal garage would do. In fact from what I have heard outside this forum they are an outstanding and moral workshop, so good on them. Might be some good advertising in here for them.

Standby for a beauty. And might I add.what you are about to read is nothing on the submissions of this guy. Similar but much just mutch less:)

Known to police eh! I'm not surprised by that revelation.
Perhaps you should refer him to this trademe thread! He might then get some real perspective rather than his delusional one.

No, don't do that.He would refer it to the tribunal and undoubtedly twist it as an example of your misrepresenting the facts (as he sees them).You have nothing to gain from doing that.

As amusing as this character is to us, I dont think you should be publishing his emails.
By all means, share them with your friends & family but not us. You might only be enticing him if he read this thread.

Oh, what the hell.
OK whats this turkeys name & where does he live!

Funny stuff. To be honest I don't know his trademe thread.I wish I did.

Look I agree I shouldn'tpublish this stuff but its so weird that I need the general normalness of this forum to keep me sane. And I might add that out of 193 posts there haven't been too many people to say don't do it.

I am confident he is unaware of this post but it really matters not.

Anyway as I promised I will get up stairs and sort out more of his emails.

I will have to split it in 2

High Phil!

Apologies for late reply but would ya believe it Midge fell on me while fixing her darn starter motor. Seems front cross member rusted out while I's under there pinning me down all night. Called out to you and Brendon for help but . Typical! Anyway while under there used time wisely doing as you suggested my own fool inspection :)

Hey, nice try again hustling handy pre-13th fait a compli, but telling ya these guys have heard it all before and much much more. Doesn't matter if you're a lunar rocket pilot and extended family are all wealthy titled blond blue eyed Barby dolls, each with several wedding et al businesses, it doesn't answer key questions surrounding alleged misrepresentation.

Besides, disingenuousness and dearth of empathy again blinds you to extent to which bullying, intimidation and serial fiction aren't even remote approximations of the fairness to which you paradoxically refer, and indeed very last thing you're hoping for is an impartial referee (Incidentally, if and when court order you don't have a choice as to whether you'll abide). Too clever by half projecting that wee clanger! No, you yearn for a referee to whom you can sell your version of reality- ie manipulating same to your advantage by way of misleading highly impressionistic imagery.

By relentlessly defaming your adversary, whilst steadfastly portraying you/family as coquetish saints, and avoiding dispute's critical issues, your vain hope is of the referee subjugating objective meritorious reality for your fictional cum emotionally cloying version - the intellectual arrangement being that whilst technically wrong, rewarding you (or more to the point denying me) would ultimately be the right thing to do. Besides projecting your own ethical take on life it's clearly the sort of 'transacting' you're not at all unfamiliar with.

But let's say ref was looking to decipher respective credibility and called your bluff! What then! What if asked for evidence, say, of the fiction about harassing emails .! You can't really say you deleted them. Just not credible in the circumstances.

Similarly let's say you're asked for evidence of prospective buyers re fiction about purported additional offers "the day" of our agreement. (Remember originally it was "after" our agreement until realising fiction's impossibility) Again, the only thing you can say is that you deleted the email and no longer have telephone records for last April. Moreover what if you're put under oath and questioned and I offer to pay for an examination of your computer's hard drive and point out that in fact last April's telephone records are all still retrieveable .! Exactly, you're in the proverbial cart or you have to perjure yourself which means you're now in a very different cart.

One could continue in same vein throughout your extraordinary submission . like the mendacious depricating contrivance about post-trade contact, when records show apart from initial complaint, first communication two months later re ownership papers and spare set of keys. Not satisfied with original distortion you really ham it up about a purportedly "disturbing" 'singing' email. Wow, I wouldn't ride in the back of a bloody trolley with you let alone an aeroplane!:) (And yes hard not to grin re-reading adrenalin buzz to which you refer landing hundreds of passengers during a typhoon and yet feign need for support quietly sitting on your own conversing about MG trade. However, understandwarm milk, cookies and a XXL teet are on hand . just in case :)

Part 2

Without question this sort of deviance is yet again calculated to manipulate by seeking to lower your adversary's estimations in the eyes of the tribunal with the fervent hope it all translates into maligned adjudication in your favour - not at all disimilar to modus used to dispose of maligned MG.

As suggested in my submission this sort of conduct is arguably inconsistent with mere fiscal imperatives. Rather it arguably constitutes what medics define as sociopathic behaviour; ruthlessly avoiding deconstruction of carefully contrived persona which has facilitated ongoing sense of entitlement-orientated largess via corresponding sophistry cum manipulative bent

I don't really mind your copying me ongoing nauseating overtures to the tribunal if in the meantime you can moderate the nauseating infantile contrivances.

Anyway, I'll be presenting evidence Brendon referenced concerning his contact with upper echelon NZTA member who suggested I should lodge complaint forthwith to quickly determine matter one wayor the other. The evidence relates to the apparently regulatory or fait a compli outcome and obvious strategic implications which of course, surprise surprise you've seized upon (as predicted in my submission) and exploited accordingly. You're advised so you can seek rebuttal evidence if such evidence and or counterclaim exists.

Finally, even just as an experiment consciously analyse your response, observing the degree to which impulse orientates towards racketeering, so to speak, or the bona fide. Remember it's me who has the onus of proof.

'See' ya soon
Greg

Holy heck! we have a right one there.lost me at disingenuousness!

t would ya believe it Midge fell on me while fixing her darn starter motor. Seems front cross member rusted out while I's under there pinning me down all night

So this *rusted crossmember* was assisted by a moron with a jack and no axle stands!
Perhaps a reading of the LITERAL instructions on the aforementioned jack!

post 1.

Apparently there has been some rust in a cross member that is deemed to be structural.

Starting to become scary stuff - hope your family is kept out of it.
From personal experience it goes to a whole new level of seriousness once family members are involved.
That is one delusional person trying hard to scare you into a frame of mind of which you will refund said funds just to get rid of him thus meaning no need for the tribunal route.
Do not buckle, as everyone has written, print off all correspondence inc all emails whether considered minor or not from the aggreived party. Watch him do the 'balmy shuffle' at the hearing (if it even gets to that) as the tribunal person gets completely lost in his bush lawyer mumbo jumbo crap

this comes to mind
Movie Name: Bean (1997)
Quote:

Lt. Brutus: Mr. Bean, are you presently on any kind of medication!
Mr. Bean: Not that I know of.
Lt. Brutus: You certainly could use some.

The guys a nut job, clearly.

nzkiwi69 , you said this guy was "known to the Police".
Try to get the Police to confirm that, or at the very least, make the adjudicator aware of this.
What was his name again! I must have missed your post. LOL.
As a matter of interest, it might be good for you to do a THOROUGH Google search on him.
Good to know what else he's been up to.