how would the media of got the buyers phone number!
murray55,
Aug 9, 2:48am
Don't believe that for an instant .so obviously a publicity stunt !Strange how it was a vehicle only worth $3000 (their valuation), probably closer to $1500.
fordcrzy,
Aug 9, 2:52am
aaaah i see, so trade me are monitoring every $1 auction ready to notify the media at every instance. i'll keep that in mind
superdave0_13,
Aug 9, 2:54am
They'll be hoping there's no warranty issues at that price.
carstauranga001,
Aug 9, 3:01am
They are opening soon in Tauranga on the Jacobsen site Jazz. I expect you to visit them and give them the advice they need to be a success. They need to focus on VW and Fiat and this will work well on that site as it was for many years a successfull Euro site. On top of this nobody else in Tauranga is specialising in these products (used). Go on mate, there's an oportunity to work there too.
treachug,
Aug 9, 3:21am
Had a browse through the buyers feedback this morning.been lucky in car buying of recent.lol.they purchased a car in Auckland about 2 months ago for $2.46.
zephyrheaven,
Aug 9, 3:24am
Hmm, seems thats the sellers 'other' username - very few trades there
carmedic,
Aug 9, 5:35am
That was my first thought!
lusty9,
Aug 9, 8:25pm
it was all a have, the trader and dealer are one, that is why the trader is now deleted
dr.doolittle,
Aug 9, 8:38pm
All the dealer had to do was admit to a mistake on the pricing & it would have probably gone no further, if this was genuine.
I recall a few years ago HERE on TM I bought a Porsche 911 with a buy now of $1. The seller realised he'd made a mistake & it was meant to be a $1 reserve, not 'buy now'. We had a laugh & let it go. I'm sure it happens all the time without the 'media' getting involved.
tgray,
Aug 9, 8:46pm
By clicking buy now at $1, that is an offer and sale agreement between the buyer and a dealer, so the consumer guarantees act applies to this particular sale. The fact it sold for $1 is irrelevant in law, although the price would be taken into consideration if it went to the disputes tribunal. That would be quite funny wouldn't it!
dr.doolittle,
Aug 9, 8:50pm
And anyone would have to be a prize %^$#@ to try to enforce a sale based on an honest mistake.
elv,
Aug 9, 9:03pm
Obviously you are not familiar with the contractual mistakes act 1977. If a mistake is made it is unlikely to be enforced by the courts. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1977/0054/latest/DLM443652.html (b)the mistake or mistakes, as the case may be, resulted at the time of the contract??
jokerboss,
Aug 9, 9:10pm
Phill Weston has the goods : they are the words from the buyers "mouth" so to speak, I'm going with publicity stunt theory
Since the public registrations are closed, you must have an invite from a current member to be able to register and post in this thread.
Have an account? Login here.