Poli media release version is just as bad. Has numbers etc on it but really they could have taken some better pictures surely?
tamarillo,
Jul 8, 5:20am
Buggers ask public for help so people go to try and find it out then when they find it they don't bother telling same public what it was. Well thanks.
tshop,
Jul 8, 6:31am
The part looks dirty & scarred like it couldve been kicked around on the road for ages, He might of been hit cleanly & heavy then thrown instead of the side swipe scenario.
mals69,
Jul 8, 6:37am
Side mirror - how nobody in the police force could work that out is beyond me.
nice_lady,
Jul 8, 6:54am
Doh.
A photo of a low resolution photo isn't going to improve its viewability.
nice_lady,
Jul 8, 7:00am
That original photo pixelates easily. Its not a very good photo. It's not a high resolution photo. While your attempt at suggesting a better viewing method is appreciated hubby is a Computer tech. Thus I can assure you that I'm seeing the best possible version of the available photo.
Anyway doesn't matter now.
bjdw,
Jul 8, 7:00am
Yeah it does. They do it on those CSI documentaries all the time.
What were you looking for anyway . dirt particles? Higher resolution wouldn't make any difference at all if your'e that blind. I didn't actually bother enlarging .There was enough detail to see with the naked eye.I'm sure the cops already did the ground work.The media may have got it wrong.They wanted public help but as usual always spare the details for what ever reasons.
Since the public registrations are closed, you must have an invite from a current member to be able to register and post in this thread.
Have an account? Login here.