lets put in another way, it costs 0.0136585% of the purchase price to travel 100km in town. Compared to an economical car, lets say the suzuki swift which is 0.08325% of the purchase price per 100 urban km the Bentley could be considered 6 times for affordable to run for the people who would buy the corresponding vehicles.
thejazzpianoma,
May 16, 2:58am
See how much more fun you can have for about the same economy as a Nissan Elgrand!
trogedon,
May 16, 3:53am
Ugly and not a "fun" car. An open topped (or even closed topped) sports car would be "fun". The latest model Rolls Royce drove past us in Newmarket today. My wife said words to the effect of "yuk, look at that big slug".
johnf_456,
May 16, 4:58am
Time for a multiplia comparison I think
grangies,
May 16, 8:27am
What's wrong with it's fuel consumption!
It's a car that can go 318kph, according to your link.
pge,
May 16, 8:51am
Something to the effect - "Turning petrol into Pleasure" !.
clark20,
May 16, 10:12am
We had a guy at work with a Rangie V8 that did 25L . he wouldn't drive anywhere because of the cost
mrfxit,
Feb 26, 2:56pm
LOL . WTF .
AND they want "on road costs" on top of the price tag. ***** Priced from $405,714 (plus on-road costs)
Since the public registrations are closed, you must have an invite from a current member to be able to register and post in this thread.
Have an account? Login here.