Both 2017, both about the same price, give or take. Civic has a few more KM Will test drive both but wondering what others think? Thanks
kazbanz,
Jul 23, 10:29am
both solid reliable cars. IMO the Toyota is more comfortable to live with day to day and the Civic is a tadd more sporty
nice_lady,
Jul 23, 10:44am
I like the reliability of the Honda's. Had a 95 integra which I bought in 2001 . it had 50k on it when I bought it - sold it 15 yrs later at 312k. Still going strong as. Hubby's drive to work car is a 2001 civic we bought in 2008 @ 25k now done 150k, runs like a dream.
tamarillo,
Jul 23, 4:55pm
Whichever fits you better and tickles your fancy. Not any great difference between them so personal preference. I'd Honda because Corolla is simply too boring.
lk104,
Jul 24, 12:44pm
Corolla, no question.
vtecintegra,
Jul 24, 1:48pm
Both 2017 the Civic hands down.
The Civic was brand new then, the Corolla had been out for years so is quite dated. Do be aware the Civic is a much larger car - comparing hatches it's like 250mm longer and 40mm wider
carstauranga001,
Jul 24, 1:53pm
another vote for the 2017 Civic. The latest model is a large step up from the old and will be current model for a few years yet. Where as the Corolla is 2012 technology and an all new model arrives early next year.
bryshaw,
Jul 26, 5:32pm
Rented a late model Corolla and was surprised when the sun visor disintegrated. The interior was very plastic and cheap, much like earlier models.
m16d,
Nov 12, 5:13pm
Jazz 'll be along shortly.
Since the public registrations are closed, you must have an invite from a current member to be able to register and post in this thread.
Have an account? Login here.