Its not even open to interpretation. Turners hold "a" traders licence ie the same licence any other LEGAL vehicle trader is required to hold.
elect70,
Apr 27, 5:00am
^^^ Okthen allused dealers selling by auction register their business asatrader, good enough for turnersgood enough for all sellers .Something very fishy about it , there have been plenty of horrorstories aboutmany of turnerssales& buyers had no comeback , so they can continue to sell junk in any conditionwith impunity .
kazbanz,
Apr 27, 5:38am
But no -in order to be excluded there must be a "live" auction Hmm but hang on. You can bid on a Turners auction onlineEXACTLY THE SAMEas placing a bid on trade me. Ohh but turners are licenced auctioneers--boo wahh --that offeres exactly how much protection to the guy who's car blew up 5 hours after buying it from a turners auction. or the person who found out that 200k had been clipped off the cars odo.-Incidently that was agovernment auction--ie a car seized by customs and sold by turners auction with a flag saying that the odometer reading "MAY" be incorrect
oaic1,
Apr 27, 6:12am
Another glaring example of why one should be sure of ones facts before one mouths off.
kazbanz,
Apr 27, 6:22am
Sorry elect I misread your post --I'll try again. You have it backwards. Used car dealerships are required nowadays to be registered traders to legally sell cars. Be they operating from home or from a "real" caryard. You'da though then that Turners who are "above" the law wouldn't be a trader but guess what-yes they are indeed. Like I said if it looks like fish and smells like fish. But the law excludes them -ohh and other "live" auctioneers yep theres a lot of others arent there!
oaic1,
Apr 27, 6:53am
It would seem that you are the only one here arguing that this is "good news". Nobody else thinks so. Unarguable.I think not. I challenge you to come up with a good arguement for why it is good news. Cite some statistics and facts and first hand knowledge to back up your arguement. Repeatedly saying "you're wrong" doesnt count.
rob_man,
Apr 27, 7:39am
rob_man wrote:
[Yes he did. oops, was that abuse! Sorry. as you were. Or perhaps insert a moronic emoticon in lieu of an argument. What happened to: rob_man wrote: Oh for gods sake, I can see why you need to protected. I'll leave you alone then.] I wasn't talking to you, mind your own business please.
.
kazbanz,
Apr 27, 7:41am
Mate--yer talking to yaself -stop sniffin dem paint fumes
rob_man,
Apr 27, 8:04am
Hmmm. the quote thingie didn't come out right.Probably a waste of words anyway. all that cotton wool.
thejazzpianoma,
Apr 27, 9:06am
FYI bellky = troll
I see he has started bothering others since I havn't been around much.
My advice is don't engage him unless you want to encourage others of his ilk.
bellky,
Apr 27, 8:47pm
And back to square one.
Since the public registrations are closed, you must have an invite from a current member to be able to register and post in this thread.
Have an account? Login here.