1991 /Windom/ES300 with 195,000k and it drove like a bucket of crap! I remember these cars as damn nice! I guess time catches up with all of us.
jmma,
Nov 3, 6:05am
Not bad for a 25 year old car, you should drive a 25 year old Yank tank, oh that's right there isn't any. They have all fallen to bits Lol (o:
tgray,
Nov 3, 6:18am
There are lots of 25+ year old Yank Tanks in NZ that I am sure would drive great. My 1971 Mustang drove better than this.
saxman99,
Nov 3, 6:20am
I drove a 1991 BMW 850i with 172000k on the clock yesterday and it was utterly brilliant. I might drive it again next weekend.
kazbanz,
Nov 3, 6:59am
91 windom still on factory soft suspenders would by now feel pretty old n wallowy. Throw a set of suspenders at it and it will feel nicer.
bigfatmat1,
Nov 3, 7:02am
There are newer cars than this that are way worse to drive.
socram,
Nov 3, 8:57am
A lot is down to personal preference. For example, I don't really care for cars with very light power steering and soft suspension, whereas others might find my choices a bit on the harsh and heavy side. Not always a function of age. I drove a fairly recent Lexus SUV not so long back and it just didn't appeal to me at all.
vtecintegra,
Nov 26, 12:20am
The ES was never a 'real' Lexus anyway
Since the public registrations are closed, you must have an invite from a current member to be able to register and post in this thread.
Have an account? Login here.